Collisions & Claims

May 2018

Area 9 claim exaggeration information – click here

BANG! … a tyre bursts … your fault?

Highways England and their contractors will probably say so.  For years they have been claiming that most blow-outs are the fault of poor maintenance, of under-inflation and blaming drivers.

But 04/2018 – a Bridgestone & Highways England tyre debris study reveals the most common cause of a tyre related breakdown is … road hazards i.e. debris – click here to read more.

Of KPMG an MP says “I wouldn’t trust you to audit the contents of my fridge” with regard to the Carillion collapse – Independent.  KPMG were appointed to audit Kier Highways Area 9, has this stalled, stopped or been shared?  The outcome appears predetermined and to have been leaked.

You, your driver or your insured has caused damage to ‘Crown Property’ (such as a barrier) either following collision, fluid spill (commonly fuel) or a fire. Are you being overcharged by the Public Authority responsible or their contract? The answer is almost commonly ‘yes’. In some areas:

  • if the repair cost is above £10,000, the Public Authority such as Highways England, is billed by their repairing contractor, pays the invoices then seeks recovery from you.
  • if the bill is below £10,000 the contractor is not paid by the Authority but pursues you, your insurer or your company (if a fleet vehicle) for the money.

The same staff (operatives) attend the incidents, the same vehicles (plant) and same components (materials) are used in the repair: so why are drivers fleets and insurers charged more for below-threshold repairs by the contractor than they charge their Public Authority client? Furthermore, with regard to above-threshold claims, do the Highways Authority rubber-stamp payment claims – it appears so.

It appears drivers, fleets and insurers are subsidizing road maintenance; that Public Authorities are aware of this, enable and permit it

For examples, registered users click here.

I also want to ensure that drivers only pay appropriately for the damage they do to Crown property. I’m sure the current process could be simpler and I know Tim and Nick will be working to achieve this. We are certainly putting a lot of effort into reconciling the past costs that you are talking about.”
Jim O’Sullivan
Highways England 21/11/2016

But drivers, fleets and insurers are not paying appropriately, the process has not been simplified but complicated and exaggeration runs rife.

It appears Highways England has failed in its duty to monitor their contractors” – P. Swift of Claims Management & Adjusting Ltd

In 09/2015, Highways England advised with regard to their contractors “They can do what they like with their own claims, that’s absolutely nothing to do with us”Similar quotes can be found at: ‘Highways England Do Not Care‘, with Highways England acknowledging that they  also have difficulty obtaining information from their own contractors! In 11/2015 we asked pertinent questions of Highways England and a contractor’s extremely crude approach which we believed may be unlawful.  The letter is here, to date we have received no response. However, after raising 1,000’s of invoices using the flawed methodology since mid 2014, likely exaggerating each by £1,000’s the contractor, now Kier Highways Ltd, abandoned the process.  The replacement we believe to be overstatement in another form.

Indeed, what you will likely not be made aware of is that some contracts have built into them ‘protection’ for Third Parties (drivers, fleets & insurers) – but what use is a shield if you don;t know where to find it, or its existence?

If you require information from Highways England, TfL or Councils, consider using:

WhatDoTheyKnow (or click image left).


Highways England … the tail wags the dog.



  • To report an incident you have been involved in, whether on a motorway or lesser Highway, please click here.
  • If you have witnessed an incident and wish to report what you saw, please click here






Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *